30 Haziran 2024 Pazar

"Büyük Sotik Yıl" ve Sfenks'in bilmecesi(!?)

 "Büyük Sotik Yıl" ve Sfenks'in bilmecesi(!?)

"Thales yıldızlar üzerine çalışıp göğe bakarken kuyuya düştü."
(Platon, Theaetetus 174a),
***
Oysa "İjiptologlar" sürekli yere bakarken, bir de göğe baksalardı "Sfenks'in bilmecesi" çözülür müydü?
"Büyük Sotik Yıl" 1460 senede bir tekrarlanır... 1460 yılda bir..
Resimlerde "Güneş", "Timsah (Piramit)", "Siryus" ve "Aslan" (sfenks)... 1460 senede bir hizaya geliyorlar...
Sfenks'in yüzü Güneşe doğru, öyle olmalı zaten, gökteki gibi... Elbette Timsahın (piramitin) yanında...
Adamlar "yerde" taşlara inşa etmişler "göğü"...
Mısır'ın tarihleri bu döngüye bağlı, Nil taşkınları, ekonomik-politik buna bağlı...
Suya yazmamışlar, akar gider, unutulur diye...
Lütfen sende bir bak, meseleyi "Uzaylılara" getirmeden
































22 Haziran 2024 Cumartesi

Hicri Takvimin dış kanıtları

Hicri Takvimin dış kanıtları;

Belge VIII. SB 9576

Ön Yüz: [Yunanca]: Tanrının adıyla. Emir Abdullah, size Christophoros ve Theodorakis pagarkları (Herakles şehrinin) adına. Herakles şehrinde benimle olan Sarasinlerin giderlerinden dolayı senden 65 koyun (probata) aldım, sadece altmış beşi ve bunun ispatı olması için şu anki yazılı dekontu yaptım.

[Yunanca] Benim aracılığımla, notarios Yuhanna ve ροε indiksyonun ilk yılı olan Pharmouthi ayının otuzuncu gününde.

[Arapça], Bismillâhirrahmânirrahîm. İşte Abdullah b. Câbir ve arkadaşlarının kesim (cüzur) için Ahnās'tan aldığı hayvanlar. Biz, Ebû Kīr'ın küçük oğlu Tawduraq'ın naibi (hâlîfesi) ve Ebû Kīr'ın büyük oğlu İstefân'ın naibi tarafından elli koyun (sha’a) ve kesim (cüzur) için diğer on beş koyun aldık. Onun gemilerinin mürettebatı (sufun) ve [atlı birlik] düzeni (katā’b) ve ağır (piyade) cumâdelûlâ ayında 22. yılda. Ve İbn Ḥadīd bunu yazmıştır. (Frank Richard Trombley, Fiscal documents from the Muslim conquest of Egypt: military supplies and administrative dislocation, ca 639-644. In: Revue des études byzantines, tome 71, 2013; Adolf Grohmann, Greek Papyri of the early Islamic period in the Collection of Archduke Rainer. Inst. franoais d'archeologie orientale, 1957.)

 

662

Kuzey İsrail'deki Hamat Gader'de bulunan Roma dönemi hamamlarından mermer bir levha (50 x 80 cm) üzerinde Yunanca bir yazıt. Yazıt, Emevi Halifesi I. Muaviye'nin 639'dan 661'e kadar yönettiği ve 661'den 680'deki ölümüne kadar halifeliğinin metropolü olarak hizmet verdiği Suriye bölgesinde bilinen tek epigrafik tasdiktir. Haç sembolüyle başlayan yazıtın İngilizce çevirisi şöyledir:

 


  İnananların komutanı Abdullah ("Tanrı'nın Hizmetkârı") Muaviye'nin günlerinde, oradaki halkın sıcak hamamları Danışman Abuasemos (Ebu Haşim?) oğlu Abdullah tarafından, koloninin 726 yılında, Araplara göre 42. yılında, Aralık ayının beşinde, 6. yılın ikinci gününde, Gadara'nın yetkilisi Joannes'in gözetiminde hastaların iyileştirilmesi için kurtarıldı ve yeniden inşa edildi.

Nessana Papirüsleri (674-685)

 Ekim-Kasım 674

Arapça

Merhametli, Şefkatli Allah'ın adıyla!

Haris b. Abd'den Nastan halkına, Gazze kurasına, el-Halûs'un İklîmine

Beni Sa'd b. Malik'ten Adi b. Halid'e Zilka'de, Muharrem, Sefer ve Rebi' II aylarının rızkını yetmiş müdd buğday ve bir o kadar da yağ ver.

Ebu Said tarafından 54 yılının Zilka'de ayında yazılmıştır.

Ve onun toplamı yetmiş müdd buğday ve bir o kadar da yağdır. (John Casper Kraemer, Excavations at Nessana, Volume 3, Non-Literarypapyri, Princeton University Press, 1958)

British Library Additional 14,448

 

Bu Yeni [Ahit] ağustos ayının ilk günü başladı ve şubat ayından on gün geçtikten sonra tamamlandı: Yunanlıların bilinen hesaplamasına göre 1012 yılında, Ṭayyāyêlere göre 80 yılında, Mervân hanedanının krallığı sırasında, . . . günlerinde… [İsma]il. (William Wright, Catalogue of the Syriac manuscripts in the British Museum, 41-42; Michael Philip Penn, When Christians First Met Muslims, 144,145. )

Kāmed Kitabeleri

 

[#10] Hagerenlerin doksan altı yılında, Sarasinlerin emiri Abd el-Melik'in oğlu Velîd'in hükümdarlığı sırasında, bu taş ocağı, (?) taş ocakçıları (?) ve ustabaşılarından (?) oluşan Cizreli Kürd Ya‘kūb tarafından açıldı.

[#20] Doksan altı yılında Ṭayyāyê’lerin gücü altında masanın başı dümdüz olmuştu. Kumit ocağı (?), bu hangisi…

[#21] Ṭayyāyê’lerin egemenliğinin seksen altıncı yılında… taş ocağı…

[#28] Hagarenlerin yönetimi altmış altıncı yılında, Hagarenlerin emiri olan Velîd'in zamanında çalışmalara başlandı ve düzenli bir şekilde çaba harcandı. Amin.

 (https://www.persee.fr/doc/mefao_0253-164x_1939_num_22_1_1340).

 History of the patriarchs

Sonra keşişleri sakatladı ve her birinin sol elini, tanınması için halka şeklinde bir dağlama demiriyle dağladı; kilisesinin ve manastırının adını, haçsız ve İslam dönemine göre tarih ekleyerek. Böylece, Hicret'in 96. yılında,  keşişler arasında sıkıntı ve inananlara baskı vardı. (Patrologia Orientalis 5, History of the patriarchs of the Coptic Church of Alexandria, Paris 1907)

 

 

 

 




19 Haziran 2024 Çarşamba

GOLYAT’ı (Câlût) Kim öldürdü?

 GOLYAT’ı (Câlût) Kim öldürdü?

Jair-Oregim oğlu Beytüllahimli Elhanan mı?
Davûd mu?
Golyat'ın ölümünü Elhanan yerine Davut'a atfetmek tutarsızlığa yol açar.
Metinler:
“Filist ordugahından Gatlı Golyat adında usta bir dövüşçü ortaya çıktı. Boyu altı arşın bir karıştı.” (Tevrât, 1. Samuel: 17:4).
“İsrailliler'le Filistliler arasında Gov'da bir savaş daha çıktı. Beytlehemli Yareoregim'in oğlu Elhanan, Gatlı Golyat'ı öldürdü. Golyat'ın mızrağının sapı dokumacı tezgahının sırığı gibiydi.” (Tevrât, 2. Samuel: 21:19).
“İsrailliler'le Filistliler arasında çıkan bir başka savaşta Yair oğlu Elhanan, Gatlı Golyat'ın “kardeşi Lahmi'yi” öldürdü. Golyat'ın mızrağının sapı dokumacı tezgahının sırığı gibiydi.” (Tevrât, 1.Tarihler: 20:5).
“Böylece Davut Filistli Golyat'ı sapan ve taşla yendi. Elinde kılıç olmaksızın onu yere serdi (50). Sonra koşup üzerine çıktı. Golyat'ın kılıcını tutup kınından çektiği gibi onu öldürdü ve başını kesti (51). Kahraman Golyat'ın öldüğünü gören Filistliler kaçtılar (52)” (Tevrât, 1. Samuel: 17:50-52).
Soruna Çözüm Önerileri:
M.Ö. 4. yüzyıl Tarihler Kitabı bu sorunu "Yair oğlu Elhanan'ın Gititli Golyat'ın kardeşi Lahmi'yi nasıl öldürdüğünü" (1. Tarihler 20:5) anlatarak ve Lahmi adını "Beytlehemli" sözcüğünün son kısmından oluşturarak çözmüştür.
İbranice kutsal yazıların Aramice'ye çevirisi olan Targum Jonathan, Elhanan'ı Davut'la özdeşleştirmiştir, çünkü her ikisi de Beytlehem'dendir (Targum Jonathan 2 Samuel 21:19), ancak bu, Elhanan'ın Davut'un takipçilerinden biri olarak listelenmesi ve cinayetlerin farklı yerlerde gerçekleşmesi nedeniyle başka bir sorun yaratmaktadır.
Kral James Versiyonu 2 Samuel 21:19'u 1 Tarihler 20:5'le uyumlu hale getirirken, Elhanan'ın Golyat'ın kardeşini öldürdüğü şeklinde anlaşılması için kardeşinin sözcüklerini (küçük yazıyla, sonraki baskılarda italik yazıyla değiştirilmiştir) eklemiştir: "Gob'da Filistliler'le yine bir savaş oldu; Beytlehemli Jaare-oregim oğlu Elhanan, mızrağı dokumacı kirişine benzeyen Gititli Golyat'ın kardeşini öldürdü.
Yeni Uluslararası Versiyon ve Yeni İngilizce Çeviri gibi diğer Evanjelik çeviriler de 2 Samuel 21.19'u değiştirmede Kral James Versiyonu'nu takip etmiş, ikincisi metnin aktarım sırasında bozulduğuna dair özür dileyici bir argüman sunmuştur.
Bazı yorumcular Elhanan tarafından öldürülen Golyat'ın Davut tarafından öldürülen Golyat'tan farklı olduğuna inanırlar. Golyat'ın, Vaftizci Yahya'nın İlyas olarak adlandırılmasına benzer şekilde Lahmi için bir lakap olduğunu savunurlar. Ya da Lahmi'nin Golyat'ı gerçek Golyat'ın ölümünden sonra ikinci bir isim olarak benimsediğini iddia etmektedirler.


ELHANAN (İbranice אֶלְחָנָן; "Tanrı merhamet eder"), Kutsal Kitap'ta iki karakterin adı: (1) Beyt-Lehemli Dodo'nun oğlu ve Davut'un "güçlü adamlarından" biri, 30 savaşçı listesinde *Asahel'den sonra anılır (II Sam. 23:24; I Tarihler 11:26); (2) Beytlehemli Jaare-Oregim'in oğlu, "Davut'un hizmetkârlarından" biri. II Samuel 21:19'a göre Elhanan *Golyat'ı öldürürken, I Tarihler 20:5'e göre (burada Yair'in oğlu olarak anılır) Golyat'ın kardeşi Lahmi'yi öldürdü. İlk ayet I Samuel 17'deki *David ve Golyat öyküsüyle çelişir. Bu çelişkiyi çözmek için ortaya atılan çeşitli öneriler arasında B. Mazar'ın önerisi, Jaare oğlu Elhanan'ın (יערי) İşay oğlu Davut'la (ישי) özdeşleştirilmesidir. Elhanan Davut'un tahta çıkmadan önceki gerçek adıydı, Jaare ise Yesse'nin bozulmuş halidir (bkz. *David). Bazı araştırmacılar, II Samuel kaynağındaki İbranice ʾ et Golyat, yani "Golyat" sözcüklerinin, iki anlatım arasındaki çelişkiyi örtmek için I Tarihler'de ʾ aḥi Golyat, yani "Golyat'ın kardeşi" olarak değiştirildiğine inanmaktadır.


Chronique Scandaleuse

 "Chronique Scandaleuse" 

Benzerlikler Yanıltmaz mı? 

Neden Farklılıklara bakmayalım?

BET-ŞEBA mı? BET ŞUA mı? 

Ammiel mi? Eliam mı?

Davud Bet Şeba Öyküsü neden “1. Tarihler”de yok?

Neden adlar farklı?

Süleyman’ın annesi hangisi? 1. Tarihler neden “zina” olayına değin miyor?

(בת שׁוע) “Bolluğun Kızı”

“ Orada Kenanlı bir kızla karşılaştı. Kızın babasının adı Şua'ydı (שׁוע/ شُوعٌ). Yahuda kızla evlendi. ” (Tevrât, Yardılış: 38:2).

“Yahuda'nın oğulları: Er, Onan, Şela. Bu üç oğulu Yahuda'ya Kenanlı Şua'nın (שׁוע/شُوعَ) kızı doğurdu. Yahuda'nın ilk oğlu Er, RAB'bin gözünde kötüydü. Bu yüzden RAB onu öldürdü. ” (Tevrât, 1. Tarihler: 2:3). 

Ammiel'in kızı ve Davut'un karısı “Bet-Şua”

“Davut'un Yeruşalim'de doğan oğulları: Şima, Şovav, Natan, Süleyman. Bu dördü Ammiel'in (عَمِّيئِيلَ/עמיאל) kızı Bet-Şua'dan (לבת שׁוע/ بَثْشُوعَ) doğdular. ” (Tevrât, 1. Tarihler: 3:5).

“And these were born unto him in Jerusalem; Shimea, and Shobab, and Nathan, and Solomon, four, of Bathshua the daughter of Ammiel”       

Eliam’ın Kızı Bet Şeva 

(בת־שׁבע) bir yeminin kızı veya yedinci kız.

Uriya’nın karısı Bet-Şeva

“Davut onun kim olduğunu öğrenmek için birini gönderdi. Adam, "Kadın Eliam'ın kızı (אליעם/ أَلِيعَامَ) Hititli Uriya'nın karısı Bet-Şeba'dır (بَثْشَبَعَ /בת־שׁבע)" dedi. ” (Tevrât, 2. Samuel: 11:3). 

“And David sent and enquired after the woman. And one said, Is not this Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam, the wife of Uriah the Hittite? ” 

Musa'nın yasasına ne oldu? 

"Zina" edenler tevbeyle kurtuluyor muydu?

27 Mayıs 2023 Cumartesi

XLV 741'in Tarihçesi

 

741'in Tarihçesi

 

Yazar

Yazarın, İspanya'daki Emevi yetkililerinin gözüne girmiş ya da belki de onların gözüne girmek isteyen bir İber olması daha muhtemeldir

Kitap

741 Kroniği (ya da Continuatio Byzantia-Arabica veya Continuatio Isidoriana), yaklaşık 741-743 yılları arasında Endülüs'te yazılmış, çoğu oldukça kısa olan 43 bölüm ya da paragraftan oluşan Latince bir tarihtir. İberya'da Müslüman yönetimi altında yazılmış bilinen en eski Hıristiyan eseridir.

Eser 754 tarihli Chronicle'dan çok daha kısadır[1] Çok az İspanyol tarihi içerir; ilk 14 bölüm, Sevillalı Isidore'un Historia de regibus Gothorum, Vandalorum et Suevorum adlı eserinden alınan Suintila'nın hükümdarlığına (621-631) kadar olan Vizigot krallarından çok kısa bahseder. İçeriğin geri kalanı, Bizans İmparatorları ve Muhammed ile başlayan Arapların paralel liderlerini ele alan dönüşümlü bölümlerden oluşur. Bu bölümler muhtemelen Nikiû'lu John'un Chronicon Mundi'sinden ve günümüze ulaşmamış Arapça veya Süryanice eserlerden alınmıştır. Bu bölümlerin bazılarında Arapların Kuzey Afrika, İspanya, Fransa ve Orta Doğu'nun bazı bölgelerini istila etmelerinden çok kısa bir şekilde bahsedilmektedir.

İçeriğin çok azı orijinaldir; eserin değeri yazar ve dönemi hakkında ortaya koyduklarında yatmaktadır.

Bizans İmparatoru Leo III'ten ve o yıl sona eren saltanatının uzunluğundan bahsettiği için eserin tarihi 741'den daha erken olamaz.

Martín eserde halifeliğin halife I. Mervan'ın torunlarından birinin elinde olduğunu söylerken "nostris temporibus" (zamanımız) ifadesinin geçtiğine dikkat çekmiştir. Mervan'ın torunlarından bu makama gelen ilk kişi II. Velid'dir (hükümdarlığı 743-744) ve bu da muhtemelen eserin yazıldığı tarihi temsil etmektedir.

Kaynakça

Cyrille Aillet, "The Chronicle of 741", in D. Thomas and B. Roggema (ed.), Christian–Muslim Relations: A Bibliographical History, Volume 1 (Brill, 2009), pp. 284–289.

Roger Collins, The Arab Conquest of Spain, 711-797 (Blackwell, 1989).

Dubler, C.E. (1946) "Sobre la Crónica árabigo-byzantina de 741 y la influencia bizantina en la Península Ibérica", Al-Andalus 11, 283-349.

Díaz y Díaz, M.C. (1976) "La historiographia hispana desde la invasión árabe hasta el año 1000", in De Isidoro al siglo XI. Ocho estudios sobre la vida literaria peninsular, Barcelona, 203-234.

Gil, J. (1973) Corpus Scriptorum Muzarabicorum, vol. 1, Madrid, 7-14.

Martín, Jose Carlos (2007) "Los Chronica Byzantia-Arabica", e-Spania (online)

English translation of the Chronicle by Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi

Chronicle of 741

 

https://www.aymennjawad.org/23129/the-byzantine-arabic-chronicle-full-translation

In the seventh year of the aforementioned princeps,[xx] hostile Saracen rebels of the Roman provinces began causing disturbances, more secretly than by public incursions. Theodorus,[xxi] the brother[xxii] of Eraclius the Augustus, engaged in many battles against them. Having heard the news, Eraclius advised his brother that in no way should he be in conflict with such people, because he was no less familiar with knowledge of the discipline of astrology, and if anything should turn out by chance, he was not ignorant in any way.[xxiii]

A huge multitude of the Saracens brought together invaded the provinces of Syria, Arabia and Mesopotamia. Holding the principate[xxiv] over them was a man by the name of Mahmet,[xxv] born of the noblest tribe of that people:[xxvi] he was a rather knowledgeable man and a foreseer of some things to come.

Era 658: Suintila undertook the worthy reins of governance in the kingdom of the Goths.[xxvii]

Eraclius gave instructions through all the provinces and even islands of his empire, so that whatever Roman legions were placed as garrisons in diverse places of the land, should arrive at the Syrian city of Damascus to overcome the enemy.

Theodorus gave a battle with the many soldiers of the Romans at the town of Gabatha.[xxviii] But such were the terror and might of the enemy for the Roman legions that afterwards scarcely any were left alive to bear the news. In this struggle also Theodorus the brother of the Augustus was killed. The Saracens were certain that such a great mass of Roman nobles had been laid low and they had shaken off fear of the Roman name. They thus firmly took possession of the provinces that they had invaded a little while ago, and they established a kingdom at Damascus, the most splendid city of Syria.[xxix]

The aforementioned princeps of the Saracens Mahmet died after ruling his kingdom for ten years. They treat him with such great honour and reverence that they affirm that he is the apostle and prophet of God in all their sacraments and writings. In his place Habubeccar of the Saracens,[xxx] who arose from the same place as his predecessor, was elected by his own people. Leading a very great expedition into the Persian lands, he devastated the cities and towns, while capturing some of the fortifications.

Eraclius abandoned the mortal world through dropsy.

Habubeccar, indeed nearly three years after he became leader, died. After his death, Hamer undertook the reins of the kingdom of the Saracens for 10 years.[xxxi]

Era 678. Of the Romans 58. Constantinus the son of Eraclius undertook the scepters of the Roman empire within the year, despite the Senate's opposition.[xxxii]

Hamer of the Saracens directed the cohorts of his nation to wage war on all the nearby eastern and western nations in the most enterprising manner. He subjected Alexandria- also the oldest and most flourishing civil metropolis of Egypt- to the censuary yoke[xxxiii] after the Roman garrisons were cast down, which were found in the same place. And the aforementioned Hamer, leader of the Ismailites,[xxxiv] ordered for the town of Babilo to be founded[xxxv] as well as garrisons which still stand even now, to protect against the Roman realm. And while his helping armies were bringing the triumph of victory from all parts whether West or East, after ten years of his rule he was killed by a certain slave while attending prayers.

Of the Romans 59: Constans the son of Constantinus undertook the reins of administration of the state after his father died. He ruled for 27 years.[xxxvi]

For the Saracens, Etheman assumed the leadership of his people and ruled for 12 years.[xxxvii] This man joined to the control of the Saracens and subjected to their command Libya Marmoricis[xxxviii] and Pentapolis,[xxxix] as well as Kazania[xl] and even Aethiopia, which lie beyond Egypt in the expanses of desert. And he made very many cities of the Persians tributaries. After accomplishing these things, Etheman was killed in their civil war.

But soon Moabia obtained his seat and ruled for 25 years.[xli] For five of these years he waged civil wars with his own people. For 20 years indeed he made all the peoples of the Ismailites obedient with the greatest happiness.[xlii] Constans the Augustus unsuccessfully fought against him despite gathering 1000 and more ships. He scarcely managed to escape with few. Through his commander also called Habedella,[xliii] who for a time held leadership of the battle command, many successes were attained in the West. He came to Tripoli. He also assailed through war Cuida and Helemptie,[xliv] and after many desolations and vanquishing and devastation, he accepted the provinces into trust. Still thirsty for blood, he arrived in Africa. Therefore preparations for battles were made, and the line of the Moors[xlv] was put to flight and all the nobility of Africa with count Gregory[xlvi] were wiped out in killing. Also the reputed Habedella, returning with large largess with all his cohorts, reached Egypt, as Moabia was acting in the tenth year of his rule.

Constans the Augustus, who ran through the state in kindling of fire, was killed at the renowned city of Syracuse in Sicily by a plot of his ministers, having ruled for 27 years. But Constantinus the elder of his sons undertook the care of administering the Roman empire.

Of the Romans 60: Constantinus heard that his father was killed at Syracuse[xlvii] by the sedition of his own men. He was crowned emperor and ruled for years.[xlviii]

Moabia the king of the Saracens directed 100,000 of his men, who might attend in obedience to his son Yzit[xlix] (to whom he had also decreed the kingdom), to assault the city of Constantinople. But as they surrounded it for the whole springtime and could not bear the toil of hunger and pestilence, they abandoned the city and captured very many towns.[l] Loaded with booty, they returned to Damascus and the king, by whom they had been directed, after a period of healing of two years. So Moabia died after he filled out twenty years of his principate and lived five of them as a civilian.

After he died, Yzit his son ruled for three years. He was a most pleasant man and considered most graciously in the eyes of all the nations subjected to his rule. He never sought any glory for the sake of royal honour for himself (as is the custom of men), but rather he lived as a civilian in common with all. Few or no successes were accomplished in his times in the armies directed by him.

After three years he put an end to his reign and left as a successor to him his son Moabia,[li] similar in his father's customs. Once he attained power, he donated a third of the tribute of money to all the provinces of his kingdom.[lii] And he himself, before he could remain for a half a year in rule, departed from this light.

Of the Romans 61. Iustinianus was put in charge of the kingdom by the senate. He ruled for 10 years before the first dispossession and for 10 years after receiving the kingdom.

After the younger Moabia died, the armies of all the provinces chose two leaders for themselves: one called Abdella,[liii] the other Maroan,[liv] the grandson of whose son holds the principate of theirs until our times. But Abdella before nearly two years had passed was elected princeps by the consent of all, while Maroan, on account of cruelty on the part of Abdella himself, was driven from the borders of Almidina[lv] with all his children and indeed his relatives and was ordered to be in exile at Damascus. But some time afterwards, with some from the army agreeing and God overlooking, he was brought to the kingdom. Waging indescribable and numerous battles for the second year continuously against each other, an innumerable multitude of men fell from both armies with mutual battles stirred up among themselves. And as they observed that their strength in turn with the excess fighting was being sapped more and more, Maroan, the king of one part, sent envoys in supplication to Constantinus the Augustus and demanded that peace be granted to him. On these conditions a peace of nine years was granted to him: that he should restore safe and sound the captives and fugitives who were in all the provinces of the Saracens to their own homes. In addition, the king of the Saracens should give to the Augustus emperor a quantity of 1000 solidi of gold of integral weight, one girl, an Arabian mule and fine silk on a daily basis without intermission for the continual cycle of 9 years. Indeed before Maroan died, he divided the provinces of the Ismailites among his sons: that is, he left the regions of Persis, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Osdroena, Arabia and Syria to his firstborn Habdelmele to rule.[lvi] He left Egypt and the parts of further Aethiopia, Tripolei and Africa and the adjacent provinces all the way to the Gaditanan straits to his son Habdellaziz.[lvii] He gave command of the armies and navies to his son Mahmet, so that once the peace ended after nine years he might be devoted to expeditions against the Roman realm and all the neighbouring nations. Thus with all things diligently and prudently fulfilled and with one year of fighting finished, he restored the debt of human nature and, as he himself had ordered, he left Habdelemele his eldest son as successor.

Of the Romans 62. With Iustinianus[lviii] overthrown in a coup, Leo was crowned king. He ruled for three years.[lix]

After him, of the Romans 63. Absimarus was put in charge in that manner. He ruled for eight years.[lx]

Habdelmele, assuming the apex of his kingdom, ruled for 20 years. In the first year of his rule, he directed all the experience and virtue of the mind of his army against Habdella (whom his father had attacked so many times in various wars) all the way finally to Macca- as they consider it, the home of Abraham, which lies in the desert between Ur of the Chaldeans and Carra the city of Mesopotamia. With the attack put in motion, king Habdella was killed by the leader of the army called Tahihie[lxi] appointed by king Habdemele. And the decapitated head of the aforementioned Habdella was presented to Habdelmele the son of king Maroan at Damascus by Aiaie the leader of the army.[lxii] Thus, in the sixth year of the rule of the aforementioned princeps,[lxiii] with domestic wars having been put to an end in all areas, he attacked the borders of external peoples in the shrewdest manner. For he made the provinces of many people, states, villages, towns and castles tributaries to his command. And as his previously mentioned brother (to whom his father had handed power from the borders of Egypt all the way to the Gaditan strait and had ordered to be a successor of the kingdom after him) had been overcome in a fatal accident, he decreed that the kingdom was all the same to be handed over to his own children. Of course he handed over to Hulit his firstborn son the kingdom after himself,[lxiv] and he also ordered his brother called Zoleiman[lxv] to be his follower. And thus by making orders out of utility, as he had learnt from his father, he set things in order for his children and after filling out the year of his rule in security he departed from this light.

Iustinianus, having been helped by the force and virtue of the Chazars, returned to Constantinople residing in his own kingdom, with those who had rebelled against him some time ago having been overcome.[lxvi]

Hulit succeeded to wield the scepters of the kingdom according to what his father had set forth. He ruled for nine years, a man of total prudence in setting forth the armies, and though lacking divine favour, it was such that he broke the courage of almost all the nearest peoples. Among all things he made the Roman realm weak through assiduous devastation. He also brought together under his rule the nearby islands. He thoroughly tamed the borders of India by devastation. Also in the western parts he attacked and conquered through the commander of his army called Musa[lxvii] the kingdom of the Goths that had been fortified by old hardness in the regions of Spain. Having overthrown the kingdom, he made them tributaries. Thus having successfully conducted all matters he died after the forces of all peoples were provided and presented to him.

Of the Romans 64: Philippicus the usurper[lxviii] invaded the kingdom after Iustianianus was killed in a revolt that had been stirred up. After this 65. Anastasius was crowned.[lxix] And then 66. Artemius, also known as Theodosius[lxx] was put in charge of the kingdom. These men ruled civilly for five years.

Among the Arabs, after Hulit died, his blood brother Zoleiman ruled in the kingdom for three years as per what his father had laid out. This man, hostile to the Roman realm, sent his brother called Mazalema, born from the same mother, to destroy the Roman realm with 100,000 armed men having been selected to go with him. He soon reached and struck the borders of Asia. He then attacked by warfare and destroyed by fire and sword the most ancient and flourishing city of Asia: Pergamum, which was misled by trickery. He decreed that the survivors should be distributed to the army. And from here he approached the royal city and surrounded it with a siege for two years but accomplished nothing.[lxxi] Seeing that he was in danger rather than bringing about dangers, compelled by hunger, the sword and total indigence he returned not too happily to his own province now by the orders of another leader. Indeed the aforementioned leader Zoleiman had died at the end of the third year while waiting at the province of Antioch.

Of the Romans 67. While the Saracens were approaching the royal city in order to take it by storm, Leo, an expert of military discipline undertook the scepters of the state for 24 years by the Senate's acclamation.[lxxii]

The dead Zoleiman had left as successor of the Saracens in the kingdom the son of his uncle, (whom his grandfather had put in charge of the whole west from Egypt), called Amer.[lxxiii] He ruled for three years. And after him he had arranged to lead back his brother called Yzit into power.[lxxiv] Hamer also in matters of armies accomplished nothing sufficiently outstanding or anything adverse. But he was of such great benevolence and patience, that as much praise and honour are given to him by all (even external people), as has ever been brought to any living person assuming the reins of a kingdom. Indeed also this man withdrew from the place in which Zoleiman had died.

Yzit of the Saracens, succeeding in the kingdom, ruled for four years. Against this man armies of his own people, which were responsible for guarding the Persian lands, stirred up a rebellion and contrived civil wars. Ministering the councils among those people and remaining above them as the head of the crime was a Saracen called Yzit, who did not arise from that royal tribe.[lxxv] Yzit the king, having been informed of the rebellion, sent an expedition against them with his previously mentioned brother called Mazlema, born from the same mother.[lxxvi] And when both armies had come to blows in the Babylonian plains over the Tigris river, the aforementioned Yzit the leader of the rebellion was killed by the army of Yzit the king. And thus his army, having collapsed in flight, was crushed, such that, with scarcely a few escaping, they were glad merely to have survived, as mercy was granted by Mazlema the leader of the army. Also he waged many successful matters against the Roman realm. Finally in the western parts he was partially successful through the leaders of the army.

Also he made Gallia Narbonensis[lxxvii] his own through the leader of the army called Mazlema and he agitated the people of the Franks with frequent wars. And with inconsistent virtue the aforementioned leader of the army got all the way up to Toulouse, and surrounding it with siege he tried to take it by storm through different kinds of siege equipment. The peoples of the Franks, informed of this development, gathered around a leader of the same people called Eudon.[lxxviii] And thus gathered they reached Toulouse. At Toulouse both armies clashed in a grave battle. They killed Zema the leader of the army of the Saracens together with part of his army.[lxxix] They pursued the remainder of the army that collapsed through flight.

 

Therefore Yzit the leader of the Saracens, after ruling for four years, departed from this light, leaving the kingdom to his brother called Hescia.[lxxx] And after his brother he had decreed that a son of his own seed called Hulit would rule.[lxxxi]

26 Mayıs 2023 Cuma

XLIV Kronik ad 724

 Kronik ad 724

Yazar

Günümüze ulaşan iki Süryanice metinden biridir. Yazarı bilinmiyor.

Kitap

         Chronicon miscellaneum ad annum Domini 724 pertinens (artık uygun olmadığı düşünülen bir başlık), British Library, Ms.  Add'de bulunan 8. yüzyıldan kalma bir el yazmasında bulunan Süryanice dilindeki tarih yazımı metinlerinin bir koleksiyonudur. Yazması British Library Additional 14,643 (fol. 1-57) numarasıyla bilinmektedir.

          Başlık, Jean-Baptiste Chabot tarafından 1904'te CSCO koleksiyonundaki Latince çevirisine verilen başlıktır. O zamandan beri, son iki sayfayı kapsayan metnin (724'te ölen II. Yezid'e kadar saltanat süreleriyle birlikte halifelerin bir listesinin izlediği Muhammed hakkında kısa bir not), Arapça bir orijinal, sekizinci yüzyıl katibi tarafından eklenmiştir, ancak yukarıdakiyle ilgisi yoktur. Bu son belge, metnin 1862'de JPN Land tarafından Anecdota Suriye'de Liber Chalipharum olarak adlandırıldığını açıklıyor., hala oldukça yeni kitaplarda bulunan bir başlık.

 

Nihai belgeden önce gelenlerde, hiçbir şey 640 yılından öteye geçmez (ve son tarihli olay 636'dır). Herakleios'a otuz yıllık saltanat atfeden kronolojik bir pasajda 640 yılı ima edilmektedir ve bu imparator sözü edilen tarihsel düzende sonuncudur. Herakleios Şubat 641'de öldüğünden, metne son dokunuşların önceki aylarda yapılmış olması muhtemeldir.  

Kaynakça

Benjamin Harris Cowper, Syriac Miscellanies; or Extracts Relating to the First and Second General Councils, and Various other Quotations Theological, Historical, & Classical. London: Williams and Norgate, Selections from the Chronicle to 724 were translated on pp. 75-92, 1861; Jan Pieter Nicolaas Land (éd.), Anecdota Syriaca, t. I, Leyde, E. J. Brill, p. 1-24 (texte syriaque), p. 103-122 (traduction latine) (édition partielle, seulement la seconde partie à partir de Constantin) 1862; Jan Pieter Nicolaas Land, Ed., Symbolae Syriacae, vol. 1, 4 vol. Leiden: E.J. Brill, First edited by Land on pages 1–24, 1867; Ernest Walter Brooks, Ed., Chronica Minora II [Textus]. Leipzig; Paris: Otto Harrassowitz; Poussielgue, Specifically pp. 77–155, 1904; Sebastian Paul Brock, “Syriac Historical Writing: A Survey of the Main Sources”, Journal of the Iraqi Academy, Syriac Corporation, vol. 5, pp. 297-326, 1979; Andrew Palmer, « Une chronique syriaque contemporaine de la conquête arabe : essai d'interprétation théologique et politique », dans Pierre Canivet (dir.), La Syrie de Byzance à l'Islam (viie – viiie siècle), Damas, Institut français d'études arabes de Damas, p. 31-46. 1992; Andrew Palmer, The Seventh Century in the West-Syriac Chronicles, introduced, translated and annoted by A. Palmer, Liverpool, Liverpool University Press, p. 11-24 (traduction anglaise des parties de la chronique concernant le viie siècle) 1993; Alfred-Louis de Prémare, Les Fondations de l'islam, Entre écriture et histoire, édition du Seuil, 2002; James Howard-Johnston, Witnesses to a World Crisis : Historians and Histories of the Middle East in the Seventh Century, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010; Jack Tannous, Ed., “List of Caliphs Translation”. 2012.

Ernest Walter Brooks (éd.), Chronica minora II = CSCO, vol. 3 (Scriptores Syri, vol. 3), p. 77-156 ; traduction latine par Jean-Baptiste Chabot, CSCO, vol. 4 (Scriptores Syri, vol. 4), p. 61-119, Paris, 1904.

 

Chronicle Ad 724

 

https://archive.org/details/ChronicaMinoraIi/page/n58/mode/1up

https://archive.org/details/anecdotasyriaca0304land/page/218/mode/2up

https://archive.org/details/syriacmiscellani00cowp/page/92/mode/2up

https://syri.ac/ListCaliphsTranslation

https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/syriac_misc.htm#mohammed

MAHOMET AND HIS SUCCESSOES.

Memorial of the life of Mahomet, (prophet) of God.

After he entered his city, and three months before he en- tered. From his first year, and how long every king, who after him ruled over the Mahagroye, lived, after they became kings, and how long there was faction among them : three months before Mahomed came.

And Mahomed lived ten years.

And Abubecr, son of Abucohapha, two years and six months.

And Omar, son of Katab, ten years and three months.

And Othman, son of Aphan, twelve years.

And a sedition after Othman, five years and four months.

And Mohawiya, son of Abusaiphan, nineteen years and two months.

And Yezid, son of Mohawiya, three years and eight months.

And a sedition after Yezid, nine months.

And Merwan, son of Hakem, nine months.

And Ebed l'Melek, son of Merwan, twenty-one years and one month.

Walid, son of Ebed l'Melek, nine years and one month.

And Soliman, son of Ebed l'Melek, two years and nine months.

And Omar, son of Ebed l'Aziz, two years and five months.

And Yezid, son of Ebed l'Melek, four years, one month, and two days.

We reckon all these years at 104, five months and two days.

25 Mayıs 2023 Perşembe

XLIII Saha Pikoposu Zekeriyya (ö.725) bayram günü: 21 Emşîr

 Saha Pikoposu Zekeriyya (ö.725) bayram günü: 21 Emşîr

Yazar

Saha (eski adı Xois), Bir papazın oğlu olan Zekeriya Divan sekreterliği görevi yapmıştır. Divan görevinden ayrılıp Yahya Kolobos Manastırında münzevi bir yaşam sürmüştür. Daha sonra Piskoposluğa atanmıştır. Vaazlarının çoğu günümüze kadar hayatta kalmıştır.

Kitap

Emşîr eski Mısır ve Kıpti takvimlerinin altıncı ayıdır. 21 Emşîr Saha Pikoposu Zekeriyya’nın ayrılışı hakkında bir anmadır.

Kaynakça

Agathon was contemporary to the great bishop Zacharias of Sakha (Müller, 1991, pp. 2368a- 2369a; Evelyn-White, 1932, pp. 276-280) and Agathon like him was disciple of the Abraham and George (Coquin),1991, pp. 12a-13a) the disciples of John the Hegumen of Scetis (Zanetti, 1996, pp. 273-405) “the last great saints” (Evelyn-White, 1932. pp. 278-280); Detlef, G. & Müller, C. (1991). “Zacharias, Saint”. Coptic Encyclopedia, A.S. Atiya (ed.) volume 7. New York: MacMillan; S. J. Davis, “The Arabic Life of St. John the Little by Zacharias of Sakha” (MS Go¨ttingen Arabic 114)’, Coptica, 7 (2008): 1–185; Mikhail, M. S. A., and Vivian, T. (eds. ⁄ trans.), The Holy Workshop of Virtue: The Life of John the Little by Zacharias of Sakha (Collegeville: Liturgical Press, forthcoming), 2010.

https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.copt.68 (27.09.2022).

https://www.copticchurch.net/synaxarium/6_21.html?lang=en#4 (27.09.2022)

https://st-takla.org/books/en/church/synaxarium/06-amsheer/21-amshir-zacharias.html (27.09.2022).

The Departure of St. Zacharias, Bishop of Sakha - 21 Amshir

Commemorations for Amshir 21

“4. The Departure of St. Zacharias, Bishop of Sakha.

On this day also St. Zacharias, Bishop of Sakha, departed. He was the son of a scribe called John who left his job and was chosen to be a priest. His son Zacharias was raised on studying literary and religious subjects.

When he grew up, El-Wazeer appointed him as a scribe in his court. Afterward he agreed with a friend called Ptolemy who was the prefect of the town of Sakha, to leave their work and go to the wilderness to become monks. That coincided with the coming of a monk from the monastery of St. John the Short, so they decided to go with him to the monastery. When the ruler (El-Wazeer) knew about that, he prevented them from going to the monastery.

A few days later, they saw a vision as if someone was asking them, "Why did you not fulfill your vow?" Immediately, they left in secret, walking to the wilderness, without knowing their way. They met on their way, by the will of God, a monk who took them to the monastery of St. John the Short (Colobos). When their friends knew about that, they took a letter from the Governor to bring them back, but the Lord defeated their counsel. As for Zacharias and his friend, they put on the garb of the monks and exerted themselves in many worships. That was during the time of the saints Abba Gawargah and Abba Abraham who were the best guides for them.

When the Bishop of Sakha departed, the people wrote to the father, the Patriarch, asking for Zacharias to be their bishop. The Patriarch brought him and ordained him against his will. At the time of the ordination, when the Pope was about to put his hands on Zacharias' head, a light shined in the church and his face appeared as a bright star.

When he arrived to his diocese, the people rejoiced and went out to meet him with great honor. The church was illumined with his teachings. St. Zacharias was eloquent and filled with grace and he wrote many articles, sermons and discourses. He stayed on his chair for 30 years, then departed in peace.

His prayers be with us and Glory be to our God forever. Amen.”

Cibt ve Tâgût Kelimelerinin Habeşçe izleği

                                                          Cibt ve Tâgût Kelimelerinin Habeşçe izleği   “ اَلَمْ تَرَ اِلَى الَّذٖينَ ا...